HIV Fraud


facebook groups:

Umlingo WamaNgcolosi  

HIV/AIDS TRUTH & RECONCILIATION COMMISSION  

Nina Hagen song about the HIV lie
Medical Doctor injects HIV
Nobel prize winner says any one can be HIV negative again
run away from lies towards the light

 

We all Citizens and self governing people, demand the UN to make available with immediate effect a multi trillion budget to investigate the Sorcery and all affiliated industries (Pharmaceutical business with disease community) for very profitable counter life actions against all /humans/Goyem /non Zionists.

They have achieved this destructive control, (zionist Elite and associates) using the modus operandi as defined in THE PROTOCOLS OF THE ELDERS OF ZION and infiltrated ALL leading positions in ALL Corporations/Governments during the past 500 or so years.

They have been and are deliberately contaminating the sky (the whole flat earth & Oceans) with what is known as Chemtrails, intravenous make believe pharmaceutical sorcery products like vaccinations in combination with GE/GMO medications, veg, fruits, nuts, animals, processed foods/drinks and water supplies.

Their official last mile stone The Georgia guide Stones where put up in 1979, setting the ultimate population reduction target to maximum 500.000.000 goyem/people allegedly to preserve our Earth plane from total destruction.

The reversal and re establishing of a fair social community will create all the jobs/wealth we are looking for, thereby financing the birthing and take over of The Republic of Alkebulan, which was founded by our true freedom fighters of the past.

We know for a fact that Cancer and HIV do not exist, whilst we know that DNA/Ancestor altering Mycoplasm found in vaccinations and other carriers cause AIDS/Cancer and most other fatal conditions, that are then treated with extremely profitable reverse engineered sorcery/pharmaceuticals which stop the weaponized mycoplasm from further causing damage in the host/human, for as long liver, kidney and other organs can take the stress/strain caused by the side effects of the Government promoted medications/Sorcery/Pharmaceutical products for profit.


vaccvodoo umlingoVaccination Voodoo uses peer reviewed journal studies, U.S. health agencies information, and other documentation to disclose what’s in vaccines that consumers, unfortunately, do not know. Vaccine ingredients can include such components as Thimerosal, which is 49.6% ethylmercury, aluminum, 2-Phenoxyethanol, formaldehyde/Formalin, polysorbate 80, phenol, antibiotics, gluteraldehyde, MSG, sodium borate, plus a ‘shopping list’ of other neurotoxic chemicals, along with vaccine production media that includes anything from monkey kidney and other animal tissues to genetically engineered insect virus to diploid cells, which are aborted human fetal tissue. Surely, vaccines are not just an antigen and saline water, as many health professionals would have you believe. The book discusses adverse effects from vaccines both in trials, and in foreign countries where vaccination campaigns are being closed down by governments due to so many adverse effects from vaccines–something the U.S. media doesn’t report. Vaccination ‘politics’ and how they affect everyone from the newborn infant to senior citizen become apparent with the author’s candid discussion of what her research of vaccines since the 1980s has uncovered. Many of the myths revolving around vaccines and vaccinations are exposed for what they truly are, public relations and media spin. Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines will open readers’ eyes to information they should know and utilize as part of being informed healthcare

Factors Known to Cause The alledged HIV Test to show Positive

  • Anti-carbohydrate antibodies (52, 19, 13)
  • Naturally-occurring antibodies (5, 19)
  • Passive immunization: receipt of gamma globulin or immune globulin (as prophylaxis against infection which contains antibodies)(18, 26, 60, 4, 22, 42, 43, 13)
  • Leprosy (2, 25)
  • Tuberculosis (25)
  • Mycobacterium avium (25)
  • Systemic lupus erythematosus (15, 23)
  • Renal (kidney) failure (48, 23, 13)
  • Hemodialysis/renal failure (56, 16, 41, 10, 49)
  • Alpha interferon therapy in hemodialysis patients (54)
  • Flu (36)
  • Flu vaccination (30, 11, 3, 20, 13, 43)
  • Herpes simplex I (27)
  • Herpes simplex II (11)
  • Upper respiratory tract infection (cold or flu)(11)
  • Recent viral infection or exposure to viral vaccines (11)
  • Pregnancy in multiparous women (58, 53, 13, 43, 36)
  • Malaria (6, 12)
  • High levels of circulating immune complexes (6, 33)
  • Hypergammaglobulinemia (high levels of antibodies) (40, 33)
  • False positives on other tests, including RPR (rapid plasma reagent) test for syphilis (17, 48, 33, 10, 49)
  • Rheumatoid arthritis (36)
  • Hepatitis B vaccination (28, 21, 40, 43)
  • Tetanus vaccination (40)
  • Organ transplantation (1, 36)
  • Renal transplantation (35, 9, 48, 13, 56)
  • Anti-lymphocyte antibodies (56, 31)
  • Anti-collagen antibodies (found in gay men, haemophiliacs, Africans of both sexes and people with leprosy)(31)
  • Serum-positive for rheumatoid factor, antinuclear antibody (both found in rheumatoid arthritis and other autoantibodies)(14, 62, 53)
  • Autoimmune diseases (44, 29, 10, 40, 49, 43): Systemic lupus erythematosus, scleroderma, connective tissue disease, dermatomyositis
  • Acute viral infections, DNA viral infections (59, 48, 43, 53, 40, 13)
  • Malignant neoplasms (cancers)(40)
  • Alcoholic hepatitis/alcoholic liver disease (32, 48, 40,10,13, 49, 43, 53)
  • Primary sclerosing cholangitis (48, 53)
  • Hepatitis (54)
  • “Sticky” blood (in Africans) (38, 34, 40)
  • Antibodies with a high affinity for polystyrene (used in the test kits)(62, 40, 3)
  • Blood transfusions, multiple blood transfusions (63, 36,13, 49, 43, 41)
  • Multiple myeloma (10, 43, 53)
  • HLA antibodies (to Class I and II leukocyte antigens)(7, 46, 63, 48, 10, 13, 49, 43, 53)
  • Anti-smooth muscle antibody (48)
  • Anti-parietal cell antibody (48)
  • Anti-hepatitis A IgM (antibody)(48)
  • Anti-Hbc IgM (48)
  • Administration of human immunoglobulin preparations pooled before 1985 (10)
  • Haemophilia (10, 49)
  • Haematologic malignant disorders/lymphoma (43, 53, 9, 48, 13)
  • Primary biliary cirrhosis (43, 53, 13, 48)
  • Stevens-Johnson syndrome9, (48, 13)
  • Q-fever with associated hepatitis (61)
  • Heat-treated specimens (51, 57, 24, 49, 48)
  • Lipemic serum (blood with high levels of fat or lipids)(49)
  • Haemolyzed serum (blood where haemoglobin is separated from the red cells)(49)
  • Hyperbilirubinemia (10, 13)
  • Globulins produced during polyclonal gammopathies (which are seen in AIDS risk groups)(10, 13, 48)
  • Healthy individuals as a result of poorly-understood cross-reactions (10)
  • Normal human ribonucleoproteins (48,13)
  • Other retroviruses (8, 55, 14, 48, 13)
  • Anti-mitochondrial antibodies (48, 13)
  • Anti-nuclear antibodies (48, 13, 53)
  • Anti-microsomal antibodies (34)
  • T-cell leukocyte antigen antibodies (48, 13)
  • Proteins on the filter paper (13)
  • Epstein-Barr virus (37)
  • Visceral leishmaniasis (45)
  • Receptive anal sex (39, 64)

http://www.virusmyth.com/aids/hiv/cjtestfp.htm

THE HIV FRAUD

Dr. Robert Gallo

by Janine Roberts

It seems that it has been whitewashed out of history that in 1990 a powerful Congressional Investigative Sub-Committee under Representative John Dingell launched a major inquiry into Dr. Robert Gallo’s research on HIV to see if he had proved his virus caused AIDS – or had stolen a French virus as alleged by the Institut Pasteur – with the final result that Gallo’s own HIV research was trashed and he officially lost his credit for having discovered HIV, only escaping on a technicality being indicted for criminal fraud in his patent application for the HIV Test.

Gallo had documented his claim to have found HIV in several scientific papers. These are 4 in number, all published in early May 1984 in the same issue of the Science journal. All were co-authored by Dr. Robert Gallo and his team. These document his claim to have found and isolated the AIDS virus first in 1982.

The National Institutes of Health (NIH), the employers of Dr. Gallo, then immediately followed suite by launching its own Inquiry under its Office of Scientific Integrity (OSI), supervised by the Richards Panel of scientists nominated by the US National Academy of Science and Institute of Medicine.

In 1991 the Inspector General of the Department of Health began a separate investigation into whether Gallo should be indicted for lying in his application for patent rights to the HIV Blood Test, and the Department of Health replaced the OSI inquiry, after allegations that the NIH had been shredding key evidence, with one of its own, run by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI).

The ORI was the first to report. It found Gallo guilty of multiple deceptions. In 1993 it drew up a powerful indictment (Offer of Proof) that it presented to the Department of Health’s ’Research Integrity Adjudication Panel’.

This noted:

§        ‘Research process can proceed with confidence only if scientists can assume that the previously reported facts on which their work is based are correct. If the bricks are in fact false…then the scientific wall of truth may crumble…Such actions threaten the very integrity of the scientific process.’

§        ‘In light of the groundbreaking nature of this research and its profound public health implications, ORI believes that the careless and unacceptable keeping of research records…reflects irresponsible laboratory management that has permanently impaired the ability to retrace the important steps taken. ‘

§        [This] ‘put the public health at risk and, at the minimum, severely undermined the ability of the scientific community to reproduce and/or verify the efforts of the LTCB [Gallo’s ‘Laboratory for Tumor Cell Biology’] in isolating and growing the AIDS virus.’

§        ‘Gallo’s failings as a Lab Chief are evidenced in the Popovic Science paper, a paper conspicuously lacking in significant primary data and fraught with false and erroneous statements.’ (This is the paper on which the HIV Test patent was based.)

§        Gallo ‘repeatedly misrepresents distorts and suppresses data in such a way as to enhance his own claim to priority and primacy in AIDS research.’

§        ‘The [lead] Science paper contains numerous falsifications… the paper was replete with at least 22 incorrect statements concerning LTCB research, at least 11 of which were falsifications amounting to serious deviations from accepted standards for conducting and reporting evidence.’

§        ‘The absence of virtually any assay data for the parent cell line is simply unbelievable. [Especially since this was] used to develop and patent the HIV antibody blood test.’

§   Gallo, ‘in violation of all research protocols, impeded scientists wanting to follow up on his research … imposed on others the condition that they did not try to repeat his work.’

But despite the ORI supporting this with the testimony of over 100 scientists, the Panel (made up by lawyers, not scientists) decided that Popovic and Gallo were innocent since the ‘intent to deceive’ was not proved. (Dr. Mikulos Popovic was Gallo’s chief investigative scientist and had co-signed all the science papers.)   THANK YOU OMSJ

The HIV innocence group

The Causes of AIDS

15 August 2013 at 11:12

The Causes of AIDS

This article was written in June 2000
and posted during the Internet Discussion
of the South African Presidential AIDS Advisory Panel

 

1. A PROPOSAL FOR THE PHISIOLOGICAL PATHOGENESIS OF AIDS

Five types of immunological stressor agents can alter the functioning of the immune system: chemical, physical, biological, mental, and nutritional. Numerous facts illustrate the incremental growth of these agents in recent decades, as well as their diversity throughout countries and continents (1-3).

Our soil, water, air, and food are polluted with numerous chemical, physical, biological, and nutritional stressors. We are all exposed to stressor agents either involuntarily through the conditions under which we are obligated to live or voluntarily through life styles that we have chosen (1-3).

AIDS occurs in groups of people who¾ through their living conditions or life styles¾ are more heavily exposed than others to the multiple, repeated, and chronic actions of immunological stressor agents (4-11).

These stressors can produce toxicity (immunotoxic effect) and can activate the regular molecular and cell networks (immunogenic effect) when acting on immunocompetent cells. Both immunotoxic and excessive immunogenic effects (over stimulation of immune responses) induce degeneration of cells and the functioning of the immune system (7-10).

AIDS is the most severe of all acquired immunodeficiencies, secondary to multiple, repeated, and chronic exposures to immunological stressors. These progressive and continuous deleterious actions upon the immune system bring the individual to a collapse of immunological functions, with the subsequent and simultaneous appearance of infections, neoplasias, and metabolic disturbances. In addition to acting upon the immune system, stressor agents alter functioning of practically all other bodily systems and organs.

Graph #1 shows a schematic summary of this proposal for the physiopathogenesis of AIDS (7,9).

Chemical [2] and biological [1] stressors produce degenerative-immunogenic effects [6] on immunocompetent cells. On the other hand, physical [3], mental [4], nutritional [5], and chemical [2] stressors, produce degenerative-immunotoxic effects [7] on these same cells.

The immunogenic [6] and immunotoxic [7] effects on cells involved in the immune response [8] are responsible for a variety of alterations upon different steps of the immune response, such as; disturbances in antigen processing [10], lymphocyte activation [11], lymphocyte proliferation [12], lymphocyte differentiation [13], cytokine production [14], cytotoxic effect [15], and antibody production [16].

Additionally, the immunogenic [6] and immunotoxic [7] effects on other immunocompetent cells, those of the bone marrow, peripheral blood, and other tissues, are translated into a variety of alterations in cell division [17], phagocytosis [18], natural killer-cell activity [19], complement system [20], and other immune networks [21], also related to the immune response.

The severe physiological alterations of cells involved in the immune response [8], as well as alterations of other immunocompetent cells [9], are responsible for the deficiency of the three main functions of the immune system: defense [22], homeostasis [23], and surveillance [24].

Following this, certain infectious agents [25] find a unique opportunity to grow within the deficiency of the defensive functions [22], and generate a variety of infectious diseases [28], termed opportunistic infections. The deficiency of the homeostasis functions [23], depending on the physiological status of the tissues and organs of the individual [26], can be responsible for a variety of metabolic disturbances and conditions [29]. The deficiency in surveillance functions, together with the presence of carcinogen agents and all other factors involved in the carcinogenesis process, are responsible for the occurrence of neoplasias [30].

2. A PROPOSAL FOR THE MOLECULAR PATHOGENESIS OF AIDS

At a molecular level, AIDS is caused by the accumulation of free radicals, especially oxidizing agents, in all systems, organs, and tissues, but principally within the cells and chemical reactions of the immune system (4,8,10-22). As a consequence, the clinical manifestations of AIDS¾ opportunistic infections, tumors, and metabolic disturbances and conditions¾ as well as the severity of the illness are directly proportional to the levels of free radicals, especially oxidizing agents in the tissues of the AIDS patient.

Graph #2 is a illustration of this proposal (7,9).

Chemical [2] and biological [1] stressors, through an immunogenic effect [6] with an over stimulation/activation of immunocompetent cells of the immune response [8], stimulate the production of free radicals [9]. On the other hand, physical [3], mental [4], nutritional [5], and chemical [2] stressors cause an immunotoxic effect [7], either by acting directly as free radicals themselves [10], or through an indirect effect [11] can stimulate their production [12], contributing to a critical excess of free radicals [13]. The excess of radicals, together with over-saturation of the oxidation protective mechanisms [14], causes damage to immunocompetent cells through different chemical reactions [15], with degeneration of immunocompetent cells and reactions [16]. As a result, a collapse of all immunological functions will manifest itself with the subsequent and simultaneous appearance of opportunistic infections, metabolic conditions, and neoplasias. In other words, AIDS [17].

3. A PROPOSAL FOR THE DEFINITION OF AIDS

I propose to define AIDS as a toxic and nutritional syndrome, the most severe and profound of all acquired immunodeficiencies, due to multiple, repeated, and chronic exposures to immunological stressor agents. These stressors cause degenerative immunotoxic and immunogenic effects on immune cells and reactions, with the accumulation of free radicals, especially oxidizing agents, in all body systems but principally in the organs and tissues of the immune system. These progressive and continuous deleterious actions upon the immune system bring the individual to a collapse of immunological functions, with the subsequent and simultaneous appearance of infections, neoplasias, and metabolic conditions. Simultaneous with acting on the immune system, stressor agents alter the functioning of practically all other systems and organs. The continuation of this process eventually causes the death of the person (7-10).

The diverse clinical manifestations of AIDS are the direct consequence of the physiologic and molecular pathogenesis of the syndrome. The distribution of immunological stressors varies within the groups of people at risk for AIDS. This fact is the primary explanation for the great deal of variation in the clinical manifestations of AIDS within the groups of people at risk for it. While altering the immune system, the exposure to stressor agents also causes damage to practically all systems, organs and tissues of the body. This is another factor in explaining the great deal of variety in the clinical manifestations of AIDS within the groups at risk for it. In AIDS, not only the immune system collapses, but all other systems as well (7-10).

In brief, AIDS is neither an infectious disease nor is sexually transmitted. It is a toxic and nutritional syndrome caused by the alarming worldwide increment of immunological stressor agents.

REFERENCES

  1. Giraldo RA. AIDS and Stressors I: Worldwide Rise of Immunological Stressors. Toxicology Letter Supplement 1/78. 1995: s34.
  2. Giraldo RA. AIDS and Stressors I: Worldwide Rise of Immunological Stressors. In: AIDS and Stressors: AIDS is Neither an Infectious Disease nor is Sexually Transmitted. It is a Toxic-Nutritional Syndrome Caused by the Alarming Worldwide Increment of Immunological Stressor Agents. Medellín, Colombia: Impresos Begón, 1997: 23-56.
  3. Giraldo RA. El Alarmante Incremento Mundial de Agentes Estresantes Inmunologicos. In: Ahumada C, et al. Relaciones Internacionales, Politica Social y Salud: Desafios en la Era de la Globalización. Bogotá, Colombia: Fundación Cultural Javeriana, 1998: 49-73.
  4. Papadopulos-Eleopulos E. Reappraisal of AIDS – Is the Oxidation Induced by the Risk Factors the Primary Cause? Medical Hypothesis 1988; 25: 151-162.
  5. Duesberg PH. AIDS Acquired by Drug Consumption and other Noncontagious Risk Factors. Pharmac Ther 1992; 55:201-277.
  6. Duesberg PH, Rasnick D. The AIDS Dilema: Drug Diseases Blamed on a Passenger Virus. Genetica 1998; 104: 85-132.
  7. Giraldo RA. AIDS and Stressors II: A Proposal for the Pathogenesis of AIDS. Toxicology Letter Supplement 1/78. 1995: s34.
  8. Giraldo RA. AIDS and Stressors III: A Proposal for the Natural History of AIDS. Toxicology Letter Supplement 1/78. 1995: s35.
  9. Giraldo RA. AIDS and Stressors II: A Proposal for the Pathogenesis of AIDS. In: AIDS and Stressors: AIDS is Neither an Infectious Disease nor is Sexually Transmitted. It is a Toxic-Nutritional Syndrome Caused by the Alarming Worldwide Increment of Immunological Stressor Agents. Medellín, Colombia: Impresos Begón, 1997: 57-96.
  10. Giraldo RA. AIDS and Stressors III: A Proposal for the Natural History of AIDS. In: AIDS and Stressors: AIDS is Neither an Infectious Disease nor is Sexually Transmitted. It is a Toxic-Nutritional Syndrome Caused by the Alarming Worldwide Increment of Immunological Stressor Agents. Medellín, Colombia: Impresos Begón, 1997: 97-131.
  11. Giraldo RA, et al. Is It Rational to Treat or Prevent AIDS With Toxic Antiretroviral Drugs in Pregnant Women, Infants, Children, and Anybody Else? The Answer is Negative. Continuum (London) 1999; 5(6): 38-52.
  12. Dworkin B, et al. Selenium Deficiency in the Acquired Immuno-Deficiency Syndrome. J Parenteral Enteral Nutr 1986; 10:405.
  13. Fabris N, et al. AIDS, Zinc Deficiency and Thymic Hormone Failure. JAMA 1988; 259: 839.
  14. Papadopulos-Eleopulos E. Looking Back on the Oxidative Stress Theory of AIDS. Continuum (London) 1998/9; 5(5): 30-35.
  15. Papadopulos-Eleopulos E, et al. Oxidative Stress, HIV and AIDS. Res Immunol 1992; 143: 145-148.
  16. Turner VF. Reducing Agents and AIDS – Why Are We Waiting? Med J Austr 1990; 153: 502.
  17. Favier A. The Place of Oxygen Free Radicals in HIV Infections. A collection of papers presented at a conference on “The place of oxygen free radicals in HIV infection”, Les Deux Alpex, France, January 1993. Chem Biol Interac 1994; 91: 91-100.
  18. Salvain B, Mark AM. The Role of Oxidative Stress in Disease Progression in Individuals Infected by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus. J Leukocyte Biol 1992; 52: 111.
  19. Greenspan HC. The Role of Oxidative Oxygen Species, Antioxidants and Phytopharmaceuticals in Human Immunodeficiency Virus Activity. Med Hypothesis 1993; 40: 85.
  20. Piette J et al. Molecular Mechanisms of Virus Activation by Free Radicals. Collection of 5 articles presented at a conference on “The place of oxygen free radicals in HIV infection”, Les Deux Alpes, France, January 1993. Chemico-Biological Interactions 1994; 91: 79-132.
  21. Shallenberger F. Selective Compartimental Dominance: An Explanation for a Noninfectious Multifactorial Etiology for Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS), and a Rationale for Ozone Therapy and Other Immune Modulating Therapies. Med Hypothesis 1998; 50: 67-80.
  22. Passi S. Progressive Increase of Oxidative Stress in Advancing Human Immunodeficiency. Continuum (London) 1998; 5(4): 20-26.

Roberto A. Giraldo www.RobertoGiraldo.com

How the HIV Papers were fixed at the last moment.

prominent Medical Doctor (Phd) injects himself with HIV positive blood and remains HIV negative

I was now faced by a quandary. The very papers the above investigations found to be riddled with fraud were the ones I was told to go to if I wanted to know how the French HIV was proved to cause AIDS, for the American government investigators had praised as successful the last of the experiments documented in them, those carried out after February 22nd and before March 30th 1984. These, they said, had used the French virus and had finally and successfully proved it to cause AIDS. (Yet they also said these experiments were so poorly recorded that they were unrepeatable.)I was unused to the idea that I could trust only parts of scientific papers, but this was what I was expected to do. The prestigious investigations and institutions were all in agreement. They condemned as false Gallo’s claim that he and his team had isolated this virus in 1982, in other words, before the French. Instead they scathingly concluded that, as of the 22nd February 1984, that is six weeks before these Science papers went for publication on March 30th, Gallo could not have identified HIV, since up until this date ‘no HIV-specific reagents [antibodies] were available to prove that a particular sample harboured the AIDS virus.’In other words, Gallo could not have identified HIV in 1982 and 1983 as he has claimed, by detecting antibodies specific to it. The investigating scientists pointed out that it was impossible to prove an antibody targeted the AIDS virus before proving what virus caused AIDS!It was not that the French had earlier proved their virus caused AIDS. They had stated in 1983, just before sending a sample of their virus to Gallo, that: ‘the role of the virus in the aetiology of AIDS remains to be determined.’ However it was not just viruses they sent him. It was reported that it was a sample of a culture grown in their laboratory from the blood cells of a suspected AIDS patient, but their 1983 paper stated birth umbilical cord cells were in fact used, with no mention of the mother being infected. They thought some particles in the culture might be retroviruses that caused AIDS – but could not be sure. Montagnier later confessed, they could not find in their serum any particles with ‘the morphology typical of retroviruses.’Therefore, it was evident that, as it was not the French, it must have been Gallo and Popovic who proved the French virus to cause AIDS – and they must have done this in that final six weeks of experimenting.I thus began to read the account of Gallo and Popovic’s final 1984 experiments in the Science papers with great care and some expectation. These are recorded in the first of the four papers, the one for which Popovic is the lead author.From the reports of the US investigations and of others involved at the time. I knew that Gallo had been so confident in their coming success with the French virus that he had left his senior investigative scientist, Popovic, in charge of the vital work with the French virus while he went off to France to boast that they had already discovered the AIDS virus.In the same total confidence, before going abroad, he also made advance arrangements for Popovic’s paper, and three others based on it, to be published together in the May 4th issue of Science. He would not return until only two weeks before the papers were to be submitted for publication on March 30th 1984.I found this most odd – how could Gallo be absolutely certain of the outcome of these vital experiments before they were carried out! Otherwise, how does one explain his otherwise irrational confidence, his putting at risk of his professional status, by going off to boast of his success before it was achieved?I needed to know more, so I raked through the Gallo laboratory documents these investigations had unearthed, including some that John Crewdson retrieved under Freedom of Information legislation. One of these turned out to be the draft of the key Science paper, as typed up by Popovic and presented to Gallo on his return from France, a few days before the papers went to the publisher.I was thrilled to find this. I had learnt of its existence from the reports of the investigators. They told me it had only survived because Popovic had taken extraordinary steps to protect it from the shredding machine. He had secretly sent it to his sister in Austria for safekeeping, only to be made public if needed to prove who had falsified his research.He had retrieved it when the investigations began – but had hoped not to use it. Then after an interview with the OSI, he was sent by mistake a tape that recorded, not just his answers to questions, but also the comments made after he left the room. This revealed that he, rather than Gallo, was to be found guilty of scientific misconduct. Next morning he had a lawyer give this carefully hidden draft to the OSI.Knowing all this, made me extremely curious to read the manuscript. I was keen to see what Popovic had reported before Gallo did his editing. After all, it was he who had completed these experiments, not Gallo. The Investigators had reported: ‘Dr. Popovic single-handedly carried out the most important early HIV experiments.’ They had also verified that the handwritten changes on the draft were by Gallo.On his return to the States from Europe, Gallo had collected this draft, started to read it and then received a terrible shock. It was nothing like what he had anticipated. Popovic had only just left for a skiing holiday in Utah. Gallo contacted him urgently on the Friday 21st of March and ordered him back. This was only 9 days before the paper had to be sent for publication.The government investigators report that Gallo then extensively changed the paper’s typed text in his own hand at the last moment before sending it for publication. His changes are the key evidence later cited to prove that he had deliberately hidden the use of the French virus. The Congressional Staff Report stated: ‘The cover-up of the LTCB’s [Gallo’s Laboratory] work with the IP [Institut Pasteur] virus advanced to a more active phase in mid-March 1984, when Dr. Gallo systematically rewrote the manuscript for what would become a renowned LTCB paper.’

I now had in front of me what Popovic saw when he got back to the laboratory in Washington on Monday 24th March, only 6 days before this key paper had to be submitted to Science. It was fascinating to see that his 13 page typed manuscript had been absolutely covered in Gallo’s scribbled comments, redrafted paragraphs and furious notes in the margins. There were also two extra pages of his rough notes added at the end.

Gallo had changed the title of the paper. When published it would claim that they had ‘isolated’ the virus. But there was no mention of isolation in the title originally. I was intrigued. Isolation is said to be a key step in the study of any virus. I looked over the whole draft paper with care and found there were no experiments in it designed to isolate the virus for research purposes.

But where was the justification for calling the virus ‘cytopathic’! I knew that elsewhere Gallo claimed that it killed T-Cells, But extraordinarily, I could find no trace in this paper, as drafted or as published, of any evidence produced to prove this – despite this claim being made in its title.

But, wasn’t this paper supposed to prove this virus to cause AIDS by killing T-Cells? That is what everyone has said of it since. As far as I could see, after the most careful of readings, the paper simply stated that proteins thought to be from a virus were found in serum samples from less than half of the AIDS patients tested. This was not just weak evidence. It established no causal relationship at all. Surely I must be missing something? I went back to reading the draft with great care.

———- continues

I shrugged aside my sceptical thoughts and started to read the body of the paper.

On its page three was the famous admission by Popovic that he had used the French virus LAV ‘which is described here as HTLV-III’. Gallo deleted this and noted alongside: ‘I just don’t believe it. You are absolutely incredible.’ It seems he must have previously instructed Popovic not to mention the French origin.

The investigators commented later that these edits were ‘highly instructive with respect to the nature and intent of Dr. Gallo’s actions’. It was fortunately, I thought, that he had left the underlying text mostly legible.

From what I read, Popovic seems to have been entirely honest in reporting their renaming of the French virus, although he must have known this would make Gallo furious. This made me wonder if Popovic had wisely decided to make Gallo write the deceptive text himself. (Was this why Popovic went away to ski?) I hoped the rest of his original typed draft would be equally honest.

The rest of that page was simply a summary of Gallo’s earlier work with the leukaemia-linked HTLV-I. It said: ‘epidemiologic data strongly suggests AIDS is caused by an infectious agent’ but presented none of this data to support this.

But when I turned the page, I was riveted. Gallo had deleted a statement by Popovic saying: ‘Despite intensive research efforts, the causative agent of AIDS has not yet been identified.’

(images in book – scanned copies of the words as typed by Popovic and changed by Gallo)

This was totally unexpected. Nothing I read had led me to expect this. No one had mentioned these deleted words. Not Crewdson, not any of the investigators, no history of AIDS science. No one had reported these words, let alone their deletion by Gallo.

If Popovic had said ‘prior to our research, the causative agent of AIDS had not been identified’, I would not have been at all surprised. It would have been precisely what I expected. But – the sentence was unexpectedly in the present tense. Was he saying that their work with the disguised French virus had not yet succeeded? He had been brutally honest about admitting that he was using the French viruses. Was he being equally honest here?

Since then, I have repeatedly re-read the paper – and, much to my surprise, I find it contains no attempt at any point to prove that this virus causes AIDS! It is all about their efforts to grow a virus in a laboratory culture, not about research on this virus. Was Popovic admitting here that they had not yet managed to prove it causes AIDS? If so, then this would give an entirely new meaning to one of the most famous papers in virology. However, I decided that I would carefully read what else Popovic had to report before making up my mind.

Gallo clearly thought no one but Popovic would see his editing. When the paper was retyped and published a few weeks later it would be so completely changed that a government Research Integrity Adjudications Panel would report of it; ‘The paper in question, it is undisputed, made a major and lasting contribution to establishing that a retrovirus was the etiological agent of AIDS.’

I wondered with what had Gallo had replaced these words ‘despite intensive research efforts, the causative agent of AIDS has not yet been identified’ in the final published document. I checked and found that they were replaced with words that said precisely the opposite. It now read ‘that a retrovirus of the HTLV family might be an etiological agent of AIDS was suggested by the findings’.

I then found Popovic had upset Gallo still further in the very next sentence by calling Gallo’s theory that a retrovirus caused AIDS an ‘assumption’. Gallo deleted this word, replacing it with ‘hypothesis’, as can be seen in the clipping (reproduced in book)

 

Popovic then summarized the tenuous basis of their ‘assumption.’ This went: as Myron Essex had found a retrovirus believed to cause in cats a T-cell leukaemia that suppresses the immune system, as Gallo had found in humans a retrovirus HTLV-I similarly said to cause a rare leukaemia, since 30 to 40% of AIDS patients had proteins in their blood similar to those from this retrovirus, and as the putative virus in their blood produced giant cancer cells (‘syncytia’) in the laboratory; it was assumed that the AIDS virus was a newly evolved, out-of-Africa, member of the same very small HTLV family of viruses!

But it was immediately clear that Popovic had no intention of testing and proving this theory in this paper. All he went on to report were his attempts to find a way to grow the disguised French virus in a laboratory dish.

Gallo and Popovic were well aware that their earlier efforts to prove their virus (HTLV-3) caused AIDS had ended in failure. That was why Popovic was now working with a disguised French virus. I continued to read the paper with care.

From Gallo’s scribbled comments, I was surprised to learn that he clearly expected Popovic to achieve no more than to find a way of growing enough of the disguised French virus to enable them to patent a blood test for it. He never once asked for a test to be included showing it causes AIDS.

Thus in these papers there are no experiments to prove their virus killed T-cells. This was more important than one might think; given to this day no other human retrovirus is known to kill. If HIV were such an exception, if it has a unique capability, then one would expect to find here an effort to prove this.

Reading more widely, I have found scientists still do not understand how HIV can destroy T-Cells. Joseph McCune reported in Nature in 2001; ‘We still do not know how, in vivo [in the patient], the virus destroys CD4+ T cells… Several hypotheses have been proposed to explain the loss of CD4+ T cells, some of which seem to be diametrically opposed.’

But, at that time, the early 1980s, Gallo was on a rescue mission. He was trying to rescue his hypothesis that retroviruses were major causes of human diseases. He had failed to prove they were a major cause of cancer. He now wanted to prove they caused AIDS.

As I read on, I began to understand Popovic’s difficulties. He explicitly stated they could not test their suspect virus or analyse its genetic code before they found a way to produce enough of it in a laboratory culture for them to experiment with it. In this paper he was thus totally concerned with achieving just this first step.

After failing to produce retroviruses in many cell cultures, Popovic had finally tested a culture that he had found abandoned in the laboratory fridge. He divided this to make a few cultures, and then tested each to see if any would grow the French virus. He was pleased to report that some of these showed signs of retroviral growth. This was the heart of his paper – his great achievement. Nothing more or less.

And how did he judge which culture was the most successful? A table in his report explained that he had worked this out by assessing ‘the amount of released virus’ through measuring ‘ RT activity in the culture.’

Now RT, meaning the enzyme Reverse Transcriptase, is naturally part of all our cells as well as of all retroviruses and some other viruses. So, how did Popovic know the RT activity he measured was from a retrovirus? He never explained this. Yet on this depended the success of his modest experiment.

And it was not as if this ‘RT activity’ had appeared spontaneously. Popovic had only detected it after adding chemicals to the cells that were known to provoke RT activity. (These he called the ‘T-Cell Growth Factor’ or TCGF). He presumed that if these provoked RT activity in the culture, then his virus must be present. He explained: ‘the successful detection and isolation of HTLV was made possible by the discovery of TCGF.’

But Popovic found and noted that, after adding these chemicals, he only detected ‘transient’ spikes of RT activity. This frustrated him immensely. He interpreted this as meaning his retrovirus had briefly appeared – and then vanished. He stated (before Gallo edited this): ‘HTLV variants … can only be detected transiently…’

I had to ask; what if these spikes of RT activity are part of defensive reactions by cells to these chemicals? Why should they be solely linked to a particular retrovirus?

But – I then had another thought. What if the ‘AIDS virus’ was in fact a human retrovirus created by our cells to defend them against toxins? In recent times, evidence has been found for retroviruses sometimes being able to repair damaged DNA. (More about this in a later chapter.) Could the ‘HIV’ virus be in fact a particle sent out to repair damage caused by drug-based toxins – or damage caused by the diseases common in AIDS cases? This was but a thought, but Popovic had produced no evidence that proved any retroviruses to be doing damage.

Popovic wrote in his paper that, when he examined his cultures with an electron microscope, he saw particles that might be retroviruses. He had centrifuged culture samples, and found RT activity in the band with the right density for retroviruses. So – retroviruses might be present – but which ones? In any case, this did not prove they caused AIDS.

——————— continues…

Popovic began his conclusion to his paper with these words: ‘We report here the establishment and characterization of an immortalized T-Cell population which is susceptible to and permissive for HTLV cytopathic variants.’

To my great surprise, this from start to end was all of consequence that Popovic had to report in this ‘key’ paper – and he seemingly had got even this wrong by equating RT enzyme activity with the presence of their virus. After noting ‘RT activity’ in their cultures, he had felt he had no need to prove anything else before concluding: ‘Thus, the data clearly indicate continuous HTLVIII production by permanently growing T-Cell population in a long term culture.’

But, the very last paragraph of his conclusion was even more revealing. (Please excuse its technical jargon. I will explain.)

‘The transient expression of cytopathic variants of HTLV in cells from AIDS patients and the lack of a proliferate cell system which would be susceptible and permissive for the virus represented major obstacle in detection, isolation and elucidation of the agent of this disease. The establishment of a T-Cell population, which, after virus infection, can continuously grow and produce the virus, provides the possibility for detailed biological, immunological and nucleic acid studies of this agent. ‘

This is the sum total of his claims. Despite the enormous spin that Gallo later put on this paper; Popovic did not claim in it to prove any virus the cause of AIDS! He explained that all he had tried to do was to develop a culture of T-cells that would grow (‘was permissive for’) their suspect virus – as the lack of such a culture was ‘a major obstacle’ both to finding and studying such a virus. ‘Transient expression’ meant no more than that RT activity was intermittent in his culture. His last sentence states that finding such a culture – ‘providing the possibility’ for the necessary research to be carried out.

That is it. These were the very last words of his paper – before Gallo rewrote them. They make it crystal clear that all that Popovic claimed to achieve was to have made the vital detailed tests a future ‘possibility’. Without such future studies it would be impossible to identify a virus as causing AIDS, as Popovic well knew. This at last made sense of his earlier statement that the cause of AIDS remained to be discovered. It explained why Popovic’s paper contained no experiments designed to prove a virus the cause of AIDS. It explained Gallo’s urgent rewriting of the text. If he had not rewritten this paper and made it near impossible to verify, his gamble of announcing a major discovery before he had made it would have been revealed and, without any doubt, would have ended his career.

Thus, in the paper widely credited with proving HIV to cause AIDS, there is nothing of the sort. There is no mention of any experiment carried out to prove this, or even to establish that the HIV virus was in any way ‘cytotoxic’.

If Gallo did fix and spin these papers, this might explain why, against all scientific norms, he afterwards refused samples of his culture and virus to scientists whom he suspected might want to verify his conclusions and imposed on others an outrageous agreement that they would not use them to attempt to repeat these experiments. It may also explain why Gallo documented their experiments so badly, according to the ORI, that it was impossible to repeat them, leaving scientists, and all of us, having to rely on trust that he got things right.

As for AIDS being spread by the sexual transmission of HIV, no evidence at all to support this was presented in the four Science papers. Yet, immediately after these papers appeared, the press described AIDS as caused by a sexually transmitted virus. Was this also the result of spin by Robert Gallo? I would have to search for the evidence. But first, I needed to look at the other documents unearthed by the governmental investigations to see if these might contain evidence that proved HIV dangerous.

The evidence that HIV kills T-Cells

Popovic’s paper calls HTLV-3 a ‘cytopathic’ retrovirus; that is, one that causes degeneration or disease in cells. But when I searched for any evidence in his paper to support this, I could only find the observation that AIDS patients typically have low numbers of ‘Helper’ (DC4) T-Cells – with the implied inference that this was because the AIDS virus had killed them.

It is widely known in science that many factors can diminish the numbers of these cells – such as chronic drug addiction, severe malnutrition and Chronic Fatigue Syndrome. Sometimes even healthy people have low numbers. As I have noted, in 2001 Nature reported that it still was not known how HIV could kill T-cells. In 2006 a paper by Benigno Rodriquez reported that HIV can’t be killing more than 4% to 6% of the CD4 cells lost in AIDS cases – in other words not enough by itself to cause AIDS.

Popovic noted in his paper that there was a CD4-CD8 ‘reverse ratio’, before Gallo deleted it. Popovic meant by this that when Helper CD4 T-Cells cells fall in number, the population of Killer CD8 T-cells goes up commensurately, and vice versa. We now know our immune system can change CD4s into CD8s as needed. It needs only a very small surface change to them. This too might explain why sometimes there are fewer CD4 cells. It may simply be that we need more CD8s.

In some frustration I have since searched for earlier papers in which Gallo or Popovic might have proved LAV, renamed as HTLV-3, able to kill or as cytopathic – but there are none, utterly none. The Institut Pasteur likewise seems not to have proved this. Neither had Popovic or Gallo proved their own virus, HTLV3, able to kill T-Cells.

All I could discover of any possible relevance is that, whenever Gallo tried to grow T-cell cultures before 1983, the T-cells died. Many factors could have caused this, such as the wrong nutrients, bacterial contamination, or mould – the latter found by the investigators to be contaminating some of his cultures.

Gallo did mention later that cells in the culture sometimes seemed to be enlarged and clumped – but that was a consequence of them being ‘immortalised’ by being made cancerous, not of them dying.

So, did the Science papers contain any firm evidence for HIV killing blood cells? I had to conclude, after a thorough search, that no evidence at all of this was presented in these papers, despite Gallo adding the word ‘cytopathic’ to this Popovic paper’s title. But, this omission is surely something anyone can confirm – so why are so few asking these vital questions?

HIV is not in Gallo‘s pictures of HIV.’

 

A letter I found preserved in the inquiry records contained further disturbing evidence. It was from Dr Matthew Gonda, the Head of the Electron Microscopy Laboratory at the National Cancer Institute, replying to a letter from Gallo of March 1984 that had asked him to prepare for publication EM micrographs of the ‘enclosed samples’ that ‘contain HTLV’ [HIV].

Gonda’s reply is dated March 26th, just four days before these images were needed for publication. Gonda told him: ‘I would like to point out that the ‘particles’ … are in debris of a degenerated cells’ and ‘at least 50 per cent smaller’ than they should be if they were retroviruses. He concluded: ‘I do not believe any of the particles photographed are HTLV I, II or III.’ He devastatingly added that: ‘No other extracellular ‘virus-like’ particles were observed.’ Gonda copied this letter to Popovic.

Discovering this was an enormous surprise because the Science articles, as sent for publication four days later, included four micrographs ‘of HTLV-III’ credited to Gonda. In the accompanying text, Gallo declared all these particles of the right shape and correct size for HTLV-III – although close examination reveals most are of different shapes and sizes. (See the images below – HTLV-III is said to be the roundish dots bordering the vastly bigger cell.)

If these are the same images – then, for Gallo to say these are definitely of HTLV-III was highly unethical and most misleading since he had received Gonda’s expert advice to the contrary.

(the chapter continues to cite other similar letters that cast doubts on the veracity of these key HIV papers…. later chapters of the book look at recent HIV research and finds the errors continued.)

 

‘The Dynamics of CD4+ T-cell Depletion in HIV Disease’ by Joseph McCune in Nature, April 19, 2001

Benigno Rodriguez et al., published 27th September 2006 in the Journal of the American Medical Association

Letter from Matthew Gonda, Head Electron Microscopy Laboratory; to Mika Papovic (stet), 26th March 1984

 

 

Quoted in Crewdson, page 503. The appeal was heard by the Research Integrity Adjudications Panel

‘The Dynamics of CD4+ T-cell Depletion in HIV Disease’ by Joseph McCune in Nature, April 19, 2001

 

 

Dingell Congressional Inquiry Staff Report. Around mid-February [1984] further work was done by Gallo’s laboratory to try to get a rabbit antiserum that was specific to the virus, but without the virus being first truly isolated and analyzed, this was still an impossible task. There is no laboratory record of such work being done – and Popovic explicitly stated in March 1984 that this work had not been done. (In his paper as he had prepared it for publication in Science prior to Gallo editing it.

Francoise Barre-Sinoussi et al. (including. L. Montagnier). 1983. Isolation of a T-lymphotropic retrovirus from a patient at risk for Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome (AIDS). Science 220: 868-871

Professor Etienne De Harven has pointed out to the author that the microphotographs Montagnier produced of this virus show it as grown on birth cord lymphocytes. The 1983 paper stated: ‘These were detection of: ‘umbilical cord lymphocytes showed characteristic immature particles with dense crescent (C- type) budding at the plasma membrane…’ Barre-Sinoussai et al. Isolation of T-lymphotropic retrovirus from a patient at risk for acquired immune deficiency syndrome (AIDS). Science 1983;220: 868-71.

Interview with Djamel Tahi-1997. Text of video interview with Professor Luc Montagnier at the Pasteur Institute July 18th 1997. Continuum 1998; 5:30-34. The original French is given in a later footnote.

 

Staff Report of the Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, DingellCommittee on Energy and Commerce United States House of Representatives

Popovic et al.; Science, 225, 1984, pp. 497-500.

 

How Dominant Theories Monopolize Research and Stifle the Search for Truth

 

 

The nature of scientific activity has changed dramatically over the last half century, and the objectivity and rigorous search for evidence that once defined it are being abandoned. Increasingly, this text argues, dogma has taken the place of authentic science.

 

This study examines how conflicts of interest–both institutional and individual–have become pervasive in the science world, and also explores the troubling state of research funding and flaws of the peer-review process. It looks in depth at the dominance of several specific theories, including the Big Bang cosmology, human-caused global warming, HIV as a cause of AIDS, and the efficacy of anti-depressant drugs. In a scientific environment where distinguished experts who hold contrary views are shunned, this book is an important contribution to the examination of scientific heterodoxies.

 

About the Author

Henry H. Bauer is professor emeritus of chemistry and science studies and dean emeritus of arts and sciences at Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University (Virginia Tech). The author of numerous books, including a three-volume examination of scientific heterodoxies, he lives in Blacksburg, Virginia.

 

Paperback

Publisher: McFarland & Company; Original edition (Aug 30 2012)

Language: English

ISBN-10: 0786463015

ISBN-13: 978-0786463015

 

http://www.mcfarlandpub.com/book-2.php?id=978-0-7864-6301-5

 

 

 

HIV/AIDS is a lie by the pharmaceutic industry

TV watchers & Rome/Jesus followers, EBOLA and HIV, anatomy of a Medical Hoax


Investigative journalist Jon Rappoport (jonrappoport.wordpress.com/) discusses his trailblazing research on the relationship between AIDS, mass media, and the medico-pharmaceutical complex, explaining how this project readily informs his most recent analysis and insights on the Ebola phenomenon presently sweeping the globe.

Rappoport’s important 1988 book AIDS Inc. explained how the medico-pharma-media complex essentially presented the alleged AIDS epidemic as something quite apart from what it actually was–an amalgam of germ combinations and immune-related deficiencies largely unrelated to HIV. Such research has allowed him to conclude that Ebola is a similar hoax being foisted on the public without adequate scientific proof that any such malady is the culprit.

It’s exactly the kind of thing we saw before with AIDS, and with other so-called epidemics–West Nile, SARS, Swine Flu, etc. And so when this suddenly appeared in the pipeline it was much easier for me to know where to start. As always, you start with the questions, How do they know it’s an outbreak?

How do they know that if it is an outbreak–which means accelerated death and dying in a certain area–that it is caused by one thing? [How do they know] that one thing is in fact the very virus that they claim it is?

If you accept these premises right at the beginning, then you’re taking the ride. And you can try to get off later on, or you can try to argue what I consider some of the minor points.

But in fact you’re already sold on the hoax. You’re already sold on the construction of a false reality, which is the stock and trade of the medical cartel.

To accurately determine whether the threat of Ebola is actually close to what major medical organizations such as the Centers for Disease Control and World Health Organization claim it is, Rappoport has created some waves by filing a Freedom of Information Act request with the CDC to ascertain what procedures have been used to isolate the Ebola virus from those purportedly suffering from its effects. “The reliable way to decide if somebody has let’s say in this case Ebola,” Rappoport explains, involves

isolat[ing] that virus from that person. It basically means you’re not doing an indirect test. You’re doing something very direct. And so the question arose … Has anybody ever isolated the Ebola virus from any human being at anytime, anywhere? I began to hunt around for somebody that I felt was reliable on that score, and I came upon a scientific researcher by the name of David Rasnick PhD.

After embarking on a literature review of scientific research centering on Ebola, Rasnick “found no convincing evidence that this virus has ever been removed, as it were, from a human patient, analyzed, isolated and identified as the Ebola virus.”

“When I filed my FOIA request with the CDC,” Rappoport continues, “I said, and I’m quoting now, ‘My request does not seek information on this subject derived from antibody tests, PCR tests, or virus cultured and grown outside the body, nor does it seek electron microscope tests, which are in fact simulations or the results of computer models. I am, however, seeking electron microscope photos of diseased human tissue,’ because that is one way that you can, so to speak, isolate the virus.”

Rappoport and Tracy discuss how the public has more or less been propagandized into interpreting science, medicine, and disease as monolithic constructs, which lays the groundwork for the widespread misunderstanding that surrounds Ebola, AIDS, SARS, Swine Flu, and other supposed threats to public health. “The scientists themselves are viewed as non-human in a way,” Rappoport observes,

apart from everybody else. It’s kind of an archetype that functions at a very significant level in the human mind. ‘Oh well, this is a doctor. This is a researcher. This is the head of the CDC. They speak the truth, because that’s their job. That’s what they do. And so we must believe them. They have no stake in the game. They’re neutral. They’re not moved or swayed by emotion as the rest of us are.’  This is all the trapping that goes in to this particular archetype, or this particular symbol of the non-human scientist, who would never intentionally deceive. Who would never sacrifice their relentless search for the truth. And so we don’t have to think about it. All we have to do is accept it. This starts to sound like a religion–which it is.

Rappoport argues that the Ebola phenomenon sweeping public consciousness is likely the cover story and slick catch-all phrase for an array of maladies afflicting a continent that has been suffering the ravages of brutal colonization for centuries. The hoax allows megacorporations to continue their exploitation of Africa without having to address the human fallout such activities produce. “The people are sick, they are dying, but for other reasons–many other reasons that are chronic reasons, such as malnutrition, starvation, heavy industrial pollution, pesticides, vast overuse of antibiotics, lack of sanitation, contaminated water supplies, poverty, a decade of war, displacement, homelessness. On and on and on.

 

The major transnationals want to keep the population on its knees in this fashion to continue their extraction of resources. “We want to keep that population weak and dying, and the way to do that so they can’t resist is to maintain all these chronic conditions that keep people sick and dying … The best cover story in the world is a virus. Let’s say we’ve got an outbreak now … And the ignorant public in most of the world that doesn’t understand what’s going on on the ground in Sierra Leone or Liberia or Guinea immediately accepts the fact that all of these people are suffering from the virus. That’s the cover story. Every covert operation needs a great cover story.


Ebola, just like HIV is not real

 

Dr. Cyril Broderick, A Liberian scientist and a former professor of Plant Pathology at the University of Liberia’s College of Agriculture and Forestry says the West, particularly the U.S. is responsible for the Ebola outbreak in West Africa. Dr. Broderick claims the following in an exclusive article published in the Daily Observer based in Monrovia, Liberia. He wrote the following:

The US Department of Defense (DoD) is funding Ebola trials on humans, trials which started just weeks before the Ebola outbreak in Guinea and Sierra Leone. The reports continue and state that the DoD gave a contract worth $140 million dollars to Tekmira, a Canadian pharmaceutical company, to conduct Ebola research. This research work involved injecting and infusing healthy humans with the deadly Ebola virus. Hence, the DoD is listed as a collaborator in a “First in Human” Ebola clinical trial (NCT02041715, which started in January 2014 shortly before an Ebola epidemic was declared in West Africa in March.

Is it possible that the United States Department of Defense (DOD) and other Western countries are directly responsible for infecting Africans with the Ebola virus? Dr. Broderick claims that the U.S. government has a research laboratory located in a town called Kenema in Sierra Leone that studies what he calls “viral fever bioterrorism”, It is also the town where he acknowledges that is the “epicentre of the Ebola outbreak in West Africa.” Is it a fact? Is Dr. Broderick a conspiracy theorist? He says that “there is urgent need for affirmative action in protecting the less affluent of poorer countries, especially African citizens, whose countries are not as scientifically and industrially endowed as the United States and most Western countries, sources of most viral or bacterial GMOs that are strategically designed as biological weapons.” He also asks an important question when he says “It is most disturbing that the U. S. Government has been operating a viral hemorrhagic fever bioterrorism research laboratory in Sierra Leone. Are there others?”

Well, Mr. Broderick’s claims seem to be true. After all, the U.S. government has been experimenting with deadly diseases on human beings for a long time, history tells us so. One example is Guatemala. Between 1946 and 1948, the United States government under President Harry S. Truman in collaboration with Guatemalan President Juan José Arévalo and his health officials deliberately infected more than 1500 soldiers, prostitutes, prisoners and even mental patients with syphilis and other sexually transmitted diseases such as gonorrhea and chancroid (a bacterial sexual infection) out of more than 5500 Guatemalan people who participated in the experiments. The worst part of it is that none of the test subjects infected with the diseases ever gave informed consent. The Boston Globe published the discovery made by Medical historian and professor at Wellesley College, Susan M. Reverby in 2010 called ‘Wellesley professor unearths a horror: Syphilis experiments in Guatemala.’ It stated how she came across her discovery:

Picking through musty files in a Pennsylvania archive, a Wellesley College professor made a heart-stopping discovery: US government scientists in the 1940s deliberately infected hundreds of Guatemalans with syphilis and gonorrhea in experiments conducted without the subjects’ permission. Medical historian Susan M. Reverby happened upon the documents four or five years ago while researching the infamous Tuskegee syphilis study and later shared her findings with US government officials.

The unethical research was not publicly disclosed until yesterday, when President Obama and two Cabinet secretaries apologized to Guatemala’s government and people and pledged to never repeat the mistakes of the past — an era when it was not uncommon for doctors to experiment on patients without their consent.

After Reverby’s discovery, the Obama administration apparently gave an apology to then-President Alvaro Colom according to the Boston Globe:

Yesterday, Obama called President Álvaro Colom Caballeros of Guatemala to apologize, and Obama’s spokesman told reporters the experiment was “tragic, and the United States by all means apologizes to all those who were impacted by this.

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton had called Colom Thursday night to break the news to him. In her conversation with the Guatemalan president, Clinton expressed “her personal outrage and deep regret that such reprehensible research could occur,’’ said Arturo Valenzuela, assistant secretary of state for Western Hemisphere affairs. Read the rest here

written by Nana Kwame a nurse from Ghana, she claims that the deadly ebola virus is just an invention and that people in the West need to know what’s happening in West Africa.

Nana Kwome Wrote:

“People in the Western World need to know what’s happening here in West Africa. THEY ARE LYING!!! “Ebola” as a virus does NOT Exist and is NOT “Spread”. The Red Cross has brought a disease to 4 specific countries for 4 specific reasons and it is only contracted by those who receive treatments and injections from the Red Cross. That is why Liberians and Nigerians have begun kicking the Red Cross out of their countries and reporting in the news the truth. Now bear with me:   REASONS:

Most people jump to “depopulation” which is no doubt always on the mind of the West when it comes to Africa. But I assure you Africa can NEVER be depopulated by killing 160 people a day when thousands are born per day. So the real reasons are much more tangible.

Reason 1: This vaccine implemented sickness being “called” Ebola was introduced into West Africa for the end goal of getting troops on the ground in Nigeria, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. If you remember America was just trying to get into Nigeria for “Boko Haram” #BULLSHIT but that fell apart when Nigerians started telling the truth. There ARE NO GIRLS MISSING. Global support fell through the floor, and a new reason was needed to get troops into Nigeria and steal the new oil reserves they have discovered.

Reason 2: Sierra Leone is the World’s Largest Supplier of Diamonds. For the past 4 months they have been on strike, refusing to provide diamonds due to horrible working conditions and slave pay. The West will not pay a fair wage for the resources because the idea is to keep these people surviving on rice bags and foreign aid so that they remain a source of cheap slave labor forever. A reason was also needed to get troops on the ground in Sierra Leone to force an end to the diamond miners strikes. This is not the first time this has been done. When miners refuse to work troops are sent in and even if they have to kill and replace them all, the only desire is to get diamonds back flowing out of the country.
Of course to launch multiple campaigns to invade these countries separately would be way too fishy. But something like “Ebola” allows access to an entire area simultaneously…

Reason 3: In addition to stealing Nigerian oil, and forcing Sierra Leone back to mining, troops have also been sent in to FORCE vaccinations (Deadly “Ebola” Poison) onto those Africans who are not foolish enough to take them willingly.

3000 troops are being sent in to make sure that this “poison” continues to spread, because again it is only spread through vaccination. As more and more news articles are released as they have been in Liberia, informing the populous of the US lies and manipulation, more and more Africans are refusing to visit the Red Cross. Troops will force these vaccinations upon the people to ensure the visible appearance of an Ebola pandemic. In addition to this they will protect the Red Cross from the Liberians and Nigerians who have been rightfully ejecting them from their countries.

Reason 4: Last but not least, the APPEARANCE of this Ebola “pandemic” (should Americans not catch on) will be used to scare the countless millions into taking an “Ebola vaccine” which in reality is the pandemic. Already they have started with stories of how it has been brought to the U.S. and has appeared in Dallas, how white doctors were c ured but black infected are not being allowed to be treated, etc.

ALL that will do is make blacks STRIVE to get the vaccine, because it appears that the “cure” is being held back from blacks. They will run out in droves to get it and then there will be serious problems. With all we have seen revealed about vaccines this year you would think we learned our lesson. All I can do is hope so, Because they rely on our ignorance to complete their agendas.

Ask yourself: If Ebola really was spread from person to person, instead of controlled spread through vaccination – then WHY would the CDC and the US Government continue to allow flights in and out of these countries with absolutely no regulation, Or At All? We have got to start thinking and sharing information globally because they do not give the true perspective of the people who live here in West Africa. They are lying for their own benefit and there aren’t enough voices out there with a platform to help share our reality. Hundreds of thousands have been killed, paralyzed and disabled by these and other “new” vaccines all over the world and we are finally becoming aware of it. Now what will we do with all this information?”

This is not the first claim of this type. In September an article by Dr. Cyril Broderick published by The Liberian Observer alleged that deadly diseases such as Ebola and AIDS are bio weapons being tested on Africans

The same newspaper also published a story claiming formaldeyde had been dumped in Liberian water wells and was allegedly causing Ebola-like symptoms

While YourNewsWire cannot verify that these claims are true, we ask that readers do their own research and draw their own conclusions.
– See more at: http://yournewswire.com/ebo-lie-shock-claim-from-ghanaian-nurse/#sthash.fuTB5vNC.dpuf

A facebook post allegedly written by Nana Kwame a nurse from Ghana, claims that the deadly ebola virus is just an invention and that people in the West need to know what’s happening in West Africa.

Nana Kwome Wrote:

“People in the Western World need to know what’s happening here in West Africa. THEY ARE LYING!!! “Ebola” as a virus does NOT Exist and is NOT “Spread”. The Red Cross has brought a disease to 4 specific countries for 4 specific reasons and it is only contracted by those who receive treatments and injections from the Red Cross. That is why Liberians and Nigerians have begun kicking the Red Cross out of their countries and reporting in the news the truth. Now bear with me:

– See more at: http://yournewswire.com/ebo-lie-shock-claim-from-ghanaian-nurse/#sthash.fuTB5vNC.dpuf

A facebook post allegedly written by Nana Kwame a nurse from Ghana, claims that the deadly ebola virus is just an invention and that people in the West need to know what’s happening in West Africa.

Nana Kwome Wrote:

“People in the Western World need to know what’s happening here in West Africa. THEY ARE LYING!!! “Ebola” as a virus does NOT Exist and is NOT “Spread”. The Red Cross has brought a disease to 4 specific countries for 4 specific reasons and it is only contracted by those who receive treatments and injections from the Red Cross. That is why Liberians and Nigerians have begun kicking the Red Cross out of their countries and reporting in the news the truth. Now bear with me:

– See more at: http://yournewswire.com/ebo-lie-shock-claim-from-ghanaian-nurse/#sthash.fuTB5vNC.dpuf

 

A facebook post allegedly written by Nana Kwame a nurse from Ghana, claims that the deadly ebola virus is just an invention and that people in the West need to know what’s happening in West Africa.

Nana Kwome Wrote:

“People in the Western World need to know what’s happening here in West Africa. THEY ARE LYING!!! “Ebola” as a virus does NOT Exist and is NOT “Spread”. The Red Cross has brought a disease to 4 specific countries for 4 specific reasons and it is only contracted by those who receive treatments and injections from the Red Cross. That is why Liberians and Nigerians have begun kicking the Red Cross out of their countries and reporting in the news the truth. Now bear with me:

– See more at: http://yournewswire.com/ebo-lie-shock-claim-from-ghanaian-nurse/#sthash.fuTB5vNC.dpuf

Ebo-LIE? Shock Claim From Ghanaian Nurse

 

 

 

From Ghana: Ebola is not real and the only people who have gotten sick are those who got shots from the red cross 2
BY THE EVENT CHRONICLE ON OCTOBER 13, 2014 · EBOLA
Other than the original facebook post, this web site is the first one to carry this and it needs to be spread, the future may be riding on this one, ARCHIVE, POST POST AND RE-POST!

Nana Kwame wrote:

People in the Western World need to know what’s happening here in West Africa. THEY ARE LYING!!! “Ebola” as a virus does NOT Exist and is NOT “Spread”. The Red Cross has brought a disease to 4 specific countries for 4 specific reasons and it is only contracted by those who receive treatments and injections from the Red Cross. That is why Liberians and Nigerians have begun kicking the Red Cross out of their countries and reporting in the news the truth. Now bear with me:

REASONS:

Most people jump to “depopulation” which is no doubt always on the mind of the West when it comes to Africa. But I assure you Africa can NEVER be depopulated by killing 160 people a day when thousands are born per day. So the real reasons are much more tangible.

Reason 1: This vaccine implemented sickness being “called” Ebola was introduced into West Africa for the end goal of getting troops on the ground in Nigeria, Liberia, and Sierra Leone. If you remember America was just trying to get into Nigeria for “Boko Haram” ‪#‎BULLSHIT‬ but that fell apart when Nigerians started telling the truth. There ARE NO GIRLS MISSING. Global support fell through the floor, and a new reason was needed to get troops into Nigeria and steal the new oil reserves they have discovered.

Reason 2: Sierra Leone is the World’s Largest Supplier of Diamonds. For the past 4 months they have been on strike, refusing to provide diamonds due to horrible working conditions and slave pay. The West will not pay a fair wage for the resources because the idea is to keep these people surviving on rice bags and foreign aid so that they remain a source of cheap slave labor forever. A reason was also needed to get troops on the ground in Sierra Leone to force an end to the diamond miners strikes. This is not the first time this has been done. When miners refuse to work troops are sent in and even if they have to kill and replace them all, the only desire is to get diamonds back flowing out of the country.
Of course to launch multiple campaigns to invade these countries separately would be way too fishy. But something like “Ebola” allows access to an entire area simultaneously…

Reason 3: In addition to stealing Nigerian oil, and forcing Sierra Leone back to mining, troops have also been sent in to FORCE vaccinations (Deadly “Ebola” Poison) onto those Africans who are not foolish enough to take them willingly.

3000 troops are being sent in to make sure that this “poison” continues to spread, because again it is only spread through vaccination. As more and more news articles are released as they have been in Liberia, informing the populous of the US lies and manipulation, more and more Africans are refusing to visit the Red Cross. Troops will force these vaccinations upon the people to ensure the visible appearance of an Ebola pandemic. In addition to this they will protect the Red Cross from the Liberians and Nigerians who have been rightfully ejecting them from their countries.

Reason 4: Last but not least, the APPEARANCE of this Ebola “pandemic” (should Americans not catch on) will be used to scare the countless millions into taking an “Ebola vaccine” which in reality is the pandemic. Already they have started with stories of how it has been brought to the U.S. and has appeared in Dallas, how white doctors were cured but black infected are not being allowed to be treated, etc.

ALL that will do is make blacks STRIVE to get the vaccine, because it appears that the “cure” is being held back from blacks. They will run out in droves to get it and then there will be serious problems. With all we have seen revealed about vaccines this year you would think we learned our lesson. All I can do is hope so, Because they rely on our ignorance to complete their agendas.

Ask yourself: If Ebola really was spread from person to person, instead of controlled spread through vaccination – then WHY would the CDC and the US Government continue to allow flights in and out of these countries with absolutely no regulation, Or At All? We have got to start thinking and sharing information globally because they do not give the true perspective of the people who live here in West Africa. They are lying for their own benefit and there aren’t enough voices out there with a platform to help share our reality. Hundreds of thousands have been killed, paralyzed and disabled by these and other “new” vaccines all over the world and we are finally becoming aware of it. Now what will we do with all this information?

http://www.theeventchronicle.com/ebola/ghana-ebola-real-people-gotten-sick-got-shots-red-cross/

Join us and share:
https://www.facebook.com/NewWorldOutlawzKilluminati
Everyone add me please
Add: https://www.facebook.com/killuminati.ray.7

Like these pages
https://www.facebook.com/returnoftheking777
https://www.facebook.com/killuminatideathtothenwo
https://www.facebook.com/killuminatisoldierssnwoll
https://www.facebook.com/itsanewdayforall

Add/Follow our personal accounts
https://www.facebook.com/pimpedoutprofiles13
https://www.facebook.com/keri.harding.5
https://www.facebook.com/lmstaley1

Ebo-LIE? Shock Claim From Ghanaian Nurse

 

Ebo-LIE? Shock Claim From Ghanaian Nurse

 

 

You have Ebola so don’t panic

Cal Crilly

 

In 2010 this study showed Ebola genes in humans and all sorts of animals.

If Ebola is already in our genome then a “chicken or the egg” question happens, is Ebola the cause of the illness or detected from cells falling apart?

“Retroviruses are the only group of viruses known to have left a fossil record, in the form of endogenous proviruses, and approximately 8% of the human genome is made up of these elements. Although many other viruses, including non-retroviral RNA viruses, are known to generate DNA forms of their own genomes during replication, none has been found as DNA in the germline of animals. Bornaviruses, a genus of non-segmented, negative-sense RNA virus, are unique among RNA viruses in that they establish persistent infection in the cell nucleus. Here we show that elements homologous to the nucleoprotein (N) gene of bornavirus exist in the genomes of several mammalian species, including humans, non-human primates, rodents and elephants. These sequences have been designated endogenous Borna-like N (EBLN) elements.”

Endogenous non-retroviral RNA virus elements in mammalian genomes

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v463/n7277/abs/nature08695.html

 

So we are also the source of the virus.

The first fact to point out in the panic is that Selenium slows Ebola down so people who eat low protein are at risk, poor starving people mainly.

“The richest food sources of selenium are organ meats and seafood, followed by muscle meats”

http://lpi.oregonstate.edu/infocenter/minerals/selenium/

Also Brazil nuts have enough Selenium content to be basic survival foods with influenzas..

One Brazil nut is a dose of Selenium a day, in the case of viral illness a few nuts a day, don’t eat too many as

Selenium can be toxic.

Theoretical Evidence that the Ebola Virus Zaire Strain May Be Selenium-Dependent: A Factorin Pathogenesis and Viral Outbreaks?

http://orthomolecular.org/library/jom/1995/articles/1995-v10n0304-p131.shtml

Involvement of Selenium in the Regulation of Viral Virulence

http://ohioline.osu.edu/sc167/sc167_08.html

The worst symptoms of Selenium deficiency are wasting and Ebola will deplete more Selenium so wasting is expected.

 “The two major clinical signs in patients with selenium deficiency are skeletal myopathy and cardiomyopathy. White muscle disease, named because of its characteristic a colouration of the muscle is a myopathy caused by selenium deficiency in animals in the areas where the soil is low in selenium”.

White muscle disease in humans: myopathy caused by selenium deficiency in anorexia nervosa under long term total parenteral nutrition

http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/67/6/829.full

 

While the most common cause of bleeding in humans is scurvy.

The symptoms of scurvy therefore are no different from Ebola and some Africans have scurvy, the other word is starvation.

Spot the difference?

“After a few months at sea the first symptoms would appear: an awful lassitude, with terrors and depression, followed by a rash which oozed blood from hair follicles on the body and legs, and by swollen joints. About a fortnight later the gums would swell, bleed and rot, and the teeth would become loose and fall out. Suppurating sores might develop on the body, and the bones would be racked by a terrible pain. As often as not, men with scurvy would suddenly drop dead as they dragged themselves about their work.”

 

By the End, Death is a Mercy

http://www.atlasobscura.com/articles/scurvy

So people using Umlingo in Africa are unlikely to get Ebola because Umlingo is full of lemons and garlic (:

http://www.umlingo.wozaonline.co.za/

 

New vaccines won’t help, they didn’t help in the 1970’s so I would stick with good food.

People in space suits are useless, help yourselves.

“The contention that transmission by contaminated syringe and needle was the major mode of spread is based on good histories from at least 85 families that persons received injections within the three week period prior to illness onset whereas less than 1% of unaffected family members received injections.”

http://www.itg.be/internet/ebola/ebola-24.htm

THE EPIDEMIOLOGY OF EBOLA HAEMORRHAGIC FEVER IN ZAIRE, 1976

 


Fear-Mongering Is a Lucrative Business

The Ebola panic is very reminiscent of the 2005 bird flu hoax, and the 2009 H1N1 (swine flu) scare—another Level 1 “emergency” that turned out to be grossly hyped to promote the sales of unnecessary vaccines that turned out to be riddled with horrible side effects, including the devastating sleeping disorder, narcolepsy.

In 2005, President Bush made the public prediction that two million Americans might die from the bird flu. Similar predictions were issued in 2006, 2007, and again in 2008. Those fears were exposed as little more than a cruel hoax, designed to instill fear, and line the pocketbooks of various individuals and industry. I became so convinced by the evidence AGAINST the possibility of a bird flu pandemic that I wrote a New York Times bestselling book, The Bird Flu Hoax, revealing the massive fraud involved with the epidemic that never actually happened.

Then, in 2009, the World Health Organization (WHO) warned its 194 member nations to expect up to 1/3 of the world’s population to be infected with the swine flu (H1N1). Massive amounts of casualties were again predicted; dangerous vaccines were fast-tracked, and antiviral drugs later shown to be useless were stockpiled. The antiviral flu drugs Tamiflu and Relenza were found to shorten duration of symptoms by less than a day, and had no effect on the number of hospitalizations. One British study concluded that Tamiflu drugs given for the swine flu was “a waste of £500 million,” as it did nothing to halt the spread of influenza.28, 29, 30 According to The Telegraph:31

“The review, authored by Oxford University, claims that Roche, the drug’s Swiss manufacturer, gave a ‘false impression’ of its effectiveness and accuses the company of ‘sloppy science.’ The study found that Tamiflu, which was given to 240,000 people in the UK at a rate of 1,000 a week, has been linked to suicides of children in Japan and suggested that, far from easing flu symptoms, it could actually worsen them.”


In reality, the 2009 flu season turned out to be far milder than average, despite the H1N1 variant of the influenza virus being in circulation. An explosive CBS News investigation published in October 2009 clearly showed that the vast majority of “swine flu cases” were not even influenza at all, let alone H1N1. Rather, based on lab testing, the vast majority of people who reported flu-like symptoms actually had some other type of cold or upper respiratory infection.

Now, health officials warn that an Ebola outbreak in the US is just “one airline passenger away.” While theoretically plausible, panic should be tempered by the fact that the American medical system is far better equipped to contain a non-airborne virus like Ebola, compared to West Africa. According to Anthony Fauci, director of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases,32 it would be “extraordinarily unlikely that it will be an outbreak at all because of the way we take care of people, how we have the capability of isolating them, how we understand what one needs to do to protect the health care providers and the kinds of health care facilities we have.”

 

Who is manipulating the final decision makers in the ruling parties globally? So you have managed to convince your friends and family that people who have researched behind the scenes and reveal the facts of the HIV/AIDS hoax, Cancer hoax, Germtheory hoax, … are conspiracy nuts/quacks….Well this will blow your happy clappers tv land illusions to bits. Welcome to reality: The site contains only about two dozen major articles but some are near book-length. They are in-depth studies of the organisations and issues identified in their titles and all are scrupulously researched, referenced and footnoted. Much of the information they contain is very difficult – if not impossible – to find elsewhere. The articles about the Belgian Dutroux affair are beyond shocking; not only for the almost unbelievable depravities they describe, but for their extensive evidence of the systematic, calculated involvement in those depravities by groups enjoying the protection of the highest levels of western society, not to mention Russia. It is not a subject for the faint-hearted….. https://wikispooks.com/ISGP/index.html

 

 

 

The Ebola test: let the test’s inventor speak

The Ebola test: let the test’s inventor speak

by Jon Rappoport

October 6, 2014

NoMoreFakeNews.com

Amidst the hysteria about Ebola, one stubborn fact sits like a rock: everything depends upon being able to accurately diagnose Ebola in each patient.

And then it follows: you must examine the test that is being used to diagnose Ebola. Is it accurate? Does it have flaws? Is it being applied correctly?

Because, if there is a serious problem with the test, the whole house of cards collapses. The entire narrative about Ebola is fatally flawed.

Last week, when a man was admitted to a hospital in Dallas, the CDC held a press conference. CDC Director Tom Frieden stated that this patient had been diagnosed with Ebola—with a test that is “highly accurate. It’s a PCR test of blood.” (see the 2m06s mark in the video of the press conference.)

This is, indeed, the test of choice for Ebola.

However, as I’ve written, the PCR test has problems. It is open to errors. One of those errors occurs right at the beginning of the procedure:

Is the sample taken from the patient actually a virus or a piece of a virus? Or is it just an irrelevant piece of debris?

Another problem is inherent in the method of the PCR itself. The test is based on the amplification of a tiny, tiny speck of genetic material taken from a patient—blowing it up millions of times until it can be observed and analyzed.

Researchers who employ the test claim that, as a result of the procedure, they can also infer the quantity of virus that is present in the patient.

This is crucial, because unless a patient has millions and millions of Ebola virus in his body, there is absolutely no reason to think he is sick or will become sick.

So the question is: can the PCR test allow researchers and doctors to say how much virus is in a patient’s body?

Many years ago, journalist John Lauritsen approached a man named Kary Mullis for an answer.

Source-1: For a brief excerpt from John Lauritsen’s article about Kary Mullis, see Frontiers in Public Health, 23 September, 2014, “Questioning the HIV-AIDS hypothesis: 30 years of dissent,” by Patricia Goodson. (See also this.)

Source-2: For John’s 1996 article in full, see “Has Provincetown Become Protease Town?”

“Kary Mullis… is thoroughly convinced that HIV is not the cause of AIDS. With regard to the viral-load tests, which attempt to use PCR for counting viruses, Mullis has stated: ‘Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron.’ PCR is intended to identify substances qualitatively, but by its very nature is unsuited for estimating numbers. Although there is a common misimpression that the viral-load tests actually count the number of viruses in the blood, these tests cannot detect free, infectious viruses at all; they can only detect proteins that are believed, in some cases wrongly, to be unique to HIV. The tests can detect genetic sequences of viruses, but not viruses themselves.”

Kary Mullis is a biochemist. He is also a Nobel Prize winner (1993, Chemistry).

And oh yes, one other thing.

Mullis invented the PCR.

That’s why he won the Nobel Prize.

Mullis’ answer was succinct: “Quantitative PCR is an oxymoron.”

Translation: the PCR test can’t be used to say how much virus is in a person’s body.


Dr. Kary Mullis


Therefore, the CDC’s gold standard for testing Ebola patients says nothing about whether they are sick or will become sick. It says nothing about why some patients do become sick.

And the other problems with the test are significant as well: errors in carrying out the highly sensitive procedure; lab contamination of the sample taken from the patient; choice of a sample that is not a virus at all, or is the wrong virus.

And upon this foundation of sand, the whole “Ebola epidemic” is being foisted on the public.

In analyzing so-called epidemics and their causes for 27 years now (starting with my first book, “AIDS Inc., Scandal of the Century”), I have often pointed out that the diagnostic test is the key—unless people want to jump to conclusions and spread fear and walk down the wrong road, while patients die for reasons other than the stated causes—including misdirected and highly toxic medical treatment.

Again, I point that out now.

Jon Rappoport

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free emails at NoMoreFakeNews.com.


Humans that have used a lot of sugar or pharmaceutical (Sorcery-Poisoner products) medications should use pro biotics  to revive their digestive system 2 hours before using umlingo juice

Umlingo wamaNgcolosi Lifestyle juice, organic fermented veg probiotics and organic Kefir probiotics available at:


KwaNgcolosi / Inanda Dam, Umlingo production / MAD HOUSE / Ngcolosi Awareness Centre, Peninsula, Mshazi, KwaNgcolosi, 073 434 5786


Durban Overport, Farmers Produce, 161 Sparksroad (DVDs available)  open 7/7


Durban Overport, Farmers Produce, 249 Sparksroad (DVDs available)) open 7/7


Durban upon appointment 078 141 4673 Probiotics/Organic Kefir yoghurt (up on appointment DVDs available)


Durban, Morningside Cell 072 272 7298 (up on appointment, DVDs available)


Durban/KwaMashu G section  078 141 4673 Volunteer with wholesome assistance(DVDs available)


Durban/Kwamashu E section   Zekhethelo Cell 073 434 5786  or  Volunteers with wholesome assistance(DVDs available)


Durban/Ntuzuma F section Sipho Cell 084 346 7769 or 061 4746 164 Volunteers with wholesome assistance(DVDs available)


Durban/Umlazi Senzo 0712067956 or Xolani 072 2727298  J1175 eMlazi corner Mangosuthu and Juba Rd, black Cell C Container (DVDs available)


Durban Centre,  Xolani 072 2727298 Blue Lotus Spa/Salon,  No 8b, Smith Street, 407 Salmon Grove(Org. Kefir available) (DVDs available) open7/7 8am-6pm


Durban Centre, Thabo 0614580283 or Thembelani 072 5471244  349 Pinestreet, 1st floor, (opposit Nicol square) (DVDs available)


Durban Queensburgh Malvern Escombe Bellair Montclair  Khethiwe Nondaba 0845253768 (Organic Kefir Probiotics available)  (up on appointment DVDs available)


Pinetown / Oscar 0781414673   (up on appointment DVDs available)


Hillcrest, OASIS, Inanda Rd 9, Elangeni Center (Organic Kefir Probiotics available) (DVDs available)


Hillcrest  0317652662 Conscious Cafe at the Castle, Oldmain Rd 24b, Hillcrest 9am to 15pm (Closed on monday)(Organic Kefir Probiotics available


Pietermaritzburg call Mandla Khumalo 0737098114  (DVDs available)


Pietermaritzburg Edendale, Zanele 072 3056161 Shalaza Rd 6.(Sub.130 of Lot 15).  (Organic Kefir Probiotics available) (DVDs available)


Orange Freestate  Sasolberg   Qiniso 0763736992 (Organic Kefir Probiotics available)  (up on appointment DVDs available)


Richards Bay  Bongani 0763428763  Volunteer with wholesome assistance (DVDs available)


Richards Bay Wildenvelden Musa cell: 0726521203 Whats-app 0626420013 (up on appointment DVDs available) 


Esikhawini / Empangeni  Mesuli 0743064052 or 0724689908  (up on appointment DVDs available)


Empangeni / Matshani / Ngwelezane / Macekane / Ndlangezwa Thabani Rasta Nhleko 0835971295 (up on appointment DVDs available)


Vryheid Town Xolani 072 272 7298 Volunteer with wholesome assistance, Sventella Health & Hobby, Church street 199 (DVDs available)


Piet Retief / Dumbe Xolani 072 272 7298 Volunteers with wholesome assistance (DVDs available)


Newcastle Nomusa 072 106 7238, Madadeni Ses 5,  House no. 7257 (DVDs available)


Freestate Qiniso 076 373 6992  (up on appointment DVDs available)


Johannesburg Doornkop next to Dobsonville Nosipho 0837768452 (up on appointment DVDs available)  


Johannesburg Jeppestown HG Health, Jozi mall, 321 Marshal street, Shop No J4.  Tel/Fax: 011 6146768 cell 0734694094 cell 0785259166 ( DVDs available )  Bulk sales  possible


Johannesburg Katlehong Tel 0828698187  Watsapp 0784072868 Mabatho Mokgatla, 44 Ntema Street, Khumalo Valley


Johannesburg Kempton park / Thembisa  Qiniso 0763736992  (up on appointment DVDs available)


Rustenburg Florence Tsasimpe 0787914102 (up on appointment DVDs available)


Soweto  0614878971 Volunteer with wholesome assistance (Organic Kefir Probiotics available) (DVDs available)


Pretoria Central Tlou 072 158 7904 Volunteer (DVDs available)


Pretoria north Peter 084 657-4774 and 012 546-5651 Pretoria North, 223 Jack Hindon Street(up on appointment DVDs available)


Pretoria Mamelodi (15175 Mamelodi east) Princess 0624483981 Volunteer (DVDs available)


Rustenburg – Polokwane – Middleburg – Nelspruit – Vryburg for parcels call or sms: Tlou 0721587904 Volunteer (DVDs available)


Limpopo / Jane Furse  Cell 0843191766 Walter Kgopane, Mahudu Shop, Nawabe ( up on appointment DVDs available)  


Limpopo / Thohoyandou / near Louis-Trichardt  Umlingo Trader 083 314 2768 (DVDs available)


Umtata Lungisile Lusizo  Katazile 0826460881  Volunteer (up on appointment DVDs available)


Umtata NORTHCREST Dawn 0765120226/ 0782334450 Volunteer (up on appointment DVDs available)


Lusikisiki eastern cape Moses Msitshana  07172315300718178305 Volunteer (up on appointment DVDs available)


George Better Living Health Shop, shop 11b Multicentre, Cnr Meade&Market Str. Open Monday To Friday 8 To 17


King Williams Town Neliswa Gcezegana 084 590 6738 Volunteer (up on appointment DVDs available)


Capetown  Andile Mbebe  0767307857 or 0797330510  Volunteer (up on appointment DVDs available)


Capetown parcels send 0722 7272 98 Volunteer (DVDs available)


Ncotshane / Emdonini / Pongola / Deckville Zoliswa Mamba +268 76590578 Parcels available Volunteer (up on appointment DVDs available)


Swaziland Manzini and Nhlangano (From outside+268) 76219904 (DVDs available)


Swaziland Siphofaneni Zoliswa Mamba +268 76590578  Volunteer (up on appointment DVDs available)


Swaziland Manzini Simosenkosi Sikweni  (From outside +268) 76241025 Volunteer (up on appointment DVDs available)


Lesotho Teyateyaneng, Nabozipho +266 6277 7943  Matela +266 6687 0850


Mozambique Maputo / Lomahasha / Goba /  parcels available send from Swaziland Zoliswa Mamba +26876590578 Whatsapp +27787419434


Zimbabwe Bulawayo   Ennie Ngwenya   Bulawayo Zimbabwe Cell N0: 263 0772110286 or 263 8611281906


Zimbabwe Hwange  Magdalene Ncube, Hwange, Cell No:263  0772830713 or 263  0713900560


Zimbabwe Hwange  Doreen Ncube  Zimbabwe  Cell :263 0782360089


Botswana / Gaborone  Watsapp Number 00267 73052515, and for calls 0026771918030 Email: boitumelo.mmapetla@gmail.com


Namibia  Mekondjo Kambonde, +264 81 284 2315 (will be updated soon) Volunteer (up on appointment DVDs available)


Zambia. Nature’s Way Health Food Supplies, Bankers Nest, Munkoyo Street, Highridge Kabwe. Contact +26 0782523954


Call 0837464536 for Parcels send per AIR mail with premixed ingredients to make 25 liters of Umlingo WamaNgcolosi juice including organic Probiotics R3800
Please note: You will need a mixer blender clean water and purchase fresh local non GE lemons, Ginger and garlic to make home made umlingo juice.


Call 0837464536 for Parcels send per AIR mail with premixed ingredients to make 50 liters of Umlingo WamaNgcolosi juice including organic Probiotics R5000
Please note: You will need a mixer blender clean water and purchase fresh local non GE lemons, Ginger and garlic to make home made umlingo juice.


VERY IMPORTANT LIABILITY NOTICE: The parcel receiver is responsible for tracking, finding and picking up their parcel once they received their waybill details from the sender. We are only liable whilst it is in our hands prior to sending.


If you resonate with the GOD given reality of Nature and you would like to be part of the solution, you should know that any one with a good heart can become an umlingo volunteer provided you have a chest freezer, an internet based cell phone with camera and R3000 starting capital. You will have the potential to become the most success full wholesome healer in your area of residence. Inbox your CV, photo of a valid id and a motivational letter as to why you will be a great umlingo volunteer candidate, to: informationclinic@gmail.com


Home made Umlingo WamaNgcolosi juice for 1 day:
Some people will need to reduce the amounts to a minimum to avoid extreme Herxheimer side effects

1. Soak 3 average sized non GE/GMO lemons for about 10 minutes in water with 10 tablespoons of vinegar or 100gr of see salt added. Then scrub each lemon thoroughly to rid it of whatever the growers have sprayed on it.
2. Cut the lemons with skin and pips in pieces and put them in a strong mixer blender
3. Add 3 tablespoons of Extra Virgin Olive oil and 3 cups of water (www.oasiswater.co.za or www.perfectwater.co.za)
4. Add 3 tablespoons of non GE/GMO local garlic (imported garlic is irradiated and might be GE, usually very weak and not effective)
5. Add 3 tablespoons of non GE/GMO local Ginger (Double this amount for people with Lung problems/ Asthma)
6. Add 1 teaspoons of cold pressed Hemp Seed Oil (triple this amount for Epilepsy & nervous diseases)
7. Add 1 teaspoons of cold pressed Flax Seed Oil
8. Add 3 tablespoons of Aloe Vera extract (with no preservatives or take 1 heaped tablespoon of the gel from a growing aloe vera plant)
9. Add 1 teaspoon of turmeric powder ( but fresh root is better)
10. Add the daily portion of a natural Multivitamin/ Multi Mineral supplement of your choice (ours is specifically mixed for us extracted from organic produce with some african potatoe extract added)
11. Add ¼ teaspoon of Stevia powder.
12. if you want to dilute it more add ozone enriched RO filtered water (We recommend OASIS water or Perfectwater)
13. Blend untill very smooth, but do not overheat your machine.
14. Drink 1/3 of the mixture (or 1/6 or 1/12 depending on your size and condition) in the morning, 1/3(or 1/6 or 1/12 depending on your size and condition) after lunch and 1/3(or 1/6 or 1/12 depending on your size and condition) in the evening. Repeat this for 6 to 24 weeks non stop, depending on when you feel that you have fully recovered. Then you maintain your health by eating organic and wholesome foods, 50% organic raw foods whilst enjoying regular out door activity/gardening….. Humans that used sugar/carbohydrates and/or antibiotics should use organic Sauerkraut or Kefir pro biotics to enable nutritional absorption of all God given veg, nuts, tubers and fruits. Avoid animal foods and starch/sugar foods. Investigate the subject of cannabis as we humans have an endocannabinoid system within our earthly being allowing us to be creational beings. 1love

Testimonies very welcome to encourage other humans to exit from the business with disease community. Thank you

You can join facebook groups:

Umlingo WamaNgcolosi  

information clinic   

HIV/AIDS TRUTH & RECONCILIATION COMMISSION  

Sugar is a Drug

Animal eaters are ignorant

World Health Day

Truth Action Campaign

From HIV positive to HIV negative (secret group)

I stopped arvs! (secret group)

Facebook page:

Umlingo WamaNgcolosi Lifestyle